The superstition of "Me".-

Today it is overvalued the subject and this also has harmed to an understanding better than we are.

The value of the individual measures up for the sum of his disagreements, for his disability to be indifferent, for his denial to be the object, and here the disqualification of good, here the vogue of the evil.

And this actually causes a prejudice to the truth, since the "subject" exists but in many cases it is a "fiction" of him that owes to that he reminds of him his biography, but the only thing that really exists is the primary "impression" of feeling, and this is before that the subject.

Therefore, we would have to make a redefinition of which is the subject.
The modern philosophy, restoring the superstition of "me", has made of it the means of our dramas and the pivot of our restlessness, to long for the rest in the indistinción, the neutral dream of the existence without qualities, everything “ Me ” is rupture with the calm of the unit.

Who occupies oneself with attenuating your solitude or your shatterings goes against your interests and your vocation. - that is what it is said, is due to think, would be in rows, but it is not thus, if you think it, is not thus.

I propose that we should change the idea of the subject that we have and speak about another form about me in whom it can involve a wider relation of things without this I turn discriminated or relegated of them. The subject is not the important thing.

If we do not change this way of thinking we will meet doomed to a world where the souls are neverending in oneself. Where already we do not fit so all we do not prune to carry out of the same way, it this clearly.

Whereas the only way of be constituting The subject in the imaginary cultural, that is to say, across the loss of the paradise, expulsion or exclusion with a trauma, conflict of Edipo, etc, it is not completely false but they are the only manners that coming as rites of entry of the subject in a world of adults on having conceived the advent also of the language and the instance of one Third, that we prune to call Father, Law, Name of the Father. It would allow the entry Of the subject - child in the symbolic thing and the access to Language.

In this the mother does not take part that always She has been relegated and separated from the child When if we think he already is separated Of the mother for the natural mechanism of her Placenta. It is necessary to create also new values that join the woman with her.

What Diogenes with their lantern looked for was an “indifferent one”

It is spoken sincerely of ideal, of future. Nevertheless whenever I listen to speak of ideal and future in others I do not consider them that they consider me. As if all ideal or all faith was a terror form.

Between revolutions and forms of espiritualidad his heart was divided.

And his heart divides between an ideal and another one, who doubt that in a world where a 20% of the population consumes a 80% of the world-wide wealth is not necessary to already exert a policy of change and energetic saving? But his heart followed divided like not very often...

~

Everybody make an effort to remedy the life of all: The anxiety to be source of events acts on each one get something like a mental disorder or a chosen curse.

What Diogenes with their lantern looked for was an “indifferent one”

Because in truth if we are not arranged to change from us ourself there is nothing no to do.

~

Blessed be!! Ishtar, brandishing an arch on a car thrown by seven lyons.